Comment how many xiao gang did not finish class – Sohu securities-helmet怎么读

By admin. Filed in Home Products & Services  |  
TOP del.icio.us digg

Comment: how many xiao gang did not finish class? – Sohu securities Sohu financial think tank commentator Ling Shuyan (Sohu financial think tank: let the thought have fun, let the thought have power! Collect top financial wisdom, share deep and thorough investigation and research, aim to popularize common sense and provide insightful insights and professional analysis for Internet users Xiao Gang, chairman of CSRC, resigned. Last year’s stock market crash, asked Shaw steel resignation reached a climax. This year, the first day of the implementation of circuit breakers Xiao steel edge to push the market had been laughed at, Xiao Gang resignation has finally become a reality. Xiao Gang has never realized how to benefit investors. China’s stock price is largely determined by monetary policy, which the CSRC can do is limited. As the chairman of the Commission, the only way to benefit investors is to promote market-oriented reform. Market reform not only includes the fight against stock market fraud, but also includes the release of transaction control. Xiao Gang didn’t do much to crack down on the stock market fraud, but he did the opposite in terms of deregulation. The principle of economics is very clear, each of the liquidity of the stock market to impose a layer of regulation, in fact, is a blow to the total market value. What Xiao Gang should do is to implement the registration system reform, cancel the T+1 and limit the ups and downs, etc.. Because every release of a liquidity control is a boost to the market value. However, in the case of these reforms are not implemented, he added a heavy liquidity control, which can not be ridiculed by the market, the opposition of investors? How to understand regulation? Supervision should focus on "supervision", that is, anti information fraud, but not focus on the tube. Regulatory authorities believe that the stock market is managed to protect investors, but in fact it is bound to the freedom of the transaction of investors. If we don’t understand this, we just don’t understand the economy and don’t understand the capital market. Investors do have a variety of voices. Some people support a little more freedom, some people support the death of the tube, the fuse mechanism is also supported. Better regulators should be able to discern the rationality of these voices. You conform to the pipe die a little louder, the market will take revenge on you, and when the market revenge you, who had called for a dead people, will also leave you, along with the others to blame you. The stock market is the voice of the relatively concentrated place, so Xiao Gang can not carry it. But Xiao Gang is over, and there are many "Xiao Gang". Do they want to finish class? For example, officials who want to die tube network about the car market, they are adhering to Xiao Gang’s ideas, thought control protection, setting restrictions on Uber, so they want to drop, after class? Those private enterprises invested in layers of examination and approval officials, they want to class? Those officials who set up price controls, do they have to finish class? …… The purpose of these officials may be good, but they do not understand the spirit of the reform of the central government in working capacity. Questions on the supply side structural reforms of recent people’s Daily published "(authoritative interview) — authorities on the current economy to see how dry" clearly said, "this big chess under good supply side structural reforms, but also to better play the role of the hand of the government. The most important thing is to define the authority of the government at the moment

评论:还有多少肖钢没有下课?-搜狐证券   搜狐财经思想库评论员 凌书岩   (搜狐财经思想库:让思维有乐趣,让思想有力量!汇集顶尖财经智慧,分享深刻透彻的调查研究,旨在普及常识,为网友提供思想洞见和专业分析。)   证监会主席肖钢正式辞职。去年的大股灾,要求肖钢辞职的呼声形成了一个高潮。到今年,肖钢力推的熔断机制第一天实行就遭到市场的嘲笑,肖钢辞职终于变成现实。   肖钢一直没有意识到,如何才能造福股民。中国的股价很大程度上是货币政策决定的,证监会能做的有限。作为证监会主席,能造福股民的唯一办法就是推动市场化改革。市场化改革既包括打击股市欺诈,更要包括解除交易管制。   肖钢在打击股市欺诈上并没有多少建树,而在解除交易管制上,他却反其道而行之。经济学原理很清楚,每对股市流动性施加一层管制,其实就是对总市值施加一次打击。肖钢应该做的,是实行注册制改革、取消T+1和涨跌停限制等。因为每解除一项流动性管制,都是对市值的一次提升。但是,在这些改革都未实行的情况下,他反倒加了一重流动性管制,这岂能不遭到市场的嘲笑、股民的反对?   如何理解监管?监管应重在“监”,也就是反信息欺诈,而不能重在管。监管部门以为把股市管得死死的是保护股民,其实却是对股民的交易自由的束缚。没理解这一点,就是不懂经济、不懂资本市场。   股民确实有各种呼声。有人支持自由多一点,有人支持管得死一点,熔断机制也有人支持。好一点的监管者要能够辨别这些呼声的合理性。你顺应管死一点的呼声,市场会报复你,而当市场报复你时,那些原来呼吁管死一点的股民,也将弃你而去,跟着其他人一起指责你。   股市是呼声比较集中的地方,所以,肖钢扛不住了。但是,肖钢下课了,还有很多“肖钢”们,他们要不要下课?   比如,那些想管死网约车市场的官员,他们秉承的是和肖钢一样的思路,以为管制是保护,对Uber、滴滴等设置种种限制,他们要不要下课?   那些民营企业投资进行层层审批的官员,他们要不要下课?   那些设置种种价格管制的官员,他们要不要下课?   ……   这些官员的目的也许是好的,但是他们在工作能力上,并没有领会中央政府力昌改革的精神。最近人民日报发表的《七问供给侧结构性改革(权威访谈)――权威人士谈当前经济怎么看怎么干》中明确说,“下好供给侧结构性改革这盘大棋,也要更好发挥政府这只手的作用。当前最重要的是明确政府的权力边界,以自我革命的精神,在行政干预上多做‘减法’,把‘放手’当作最大的‘抓手’。”那些不懂“把‘放手’当作最大的‘抓手’”的官员,是不是该学学肖钢辞职?相关的主题文章:

Comments are closed.